logo
When looking for Notary Services in Oxford, you can trust us to provide impeccable and reliable services that shall assuredly meet your requirements in a snap!
Brand : Oxford Notary Public
Customer Service +44 01865487136
The Quorum
P.O. Box: Alec Issigonis Way
Oxford Business Park North
Oxford
OX4 2JZ
UK
kit kat nestle bar

KitKat Failed to Trademark the Four-Fingered Shape

Nestlé have once again been foiled in their attempt to trademark their distinctive four-finger shaped confectionery. It’s been a long drawn out battle against Cadbury and the law, their main rivals in the confectionery industry.

On May 17th the Court of Appeal decided that Nestle should not be granted a trade mark due to the four-finger design having ‘no inherent distinctiveness’. The 16,000 word ruling found that the KitKat shape was not a ‘badge of origin’ and therefore Nestle had no grounds for trademarking the shape.

Nestlé’s argument had been that the shape of the KitKat had acquired a distinctive character and that, when presented with the chocolate without wrapping, consumers could easily identify it as a KitKat. Cadbury, however, argued that this did not designate the KitKat shape as eligible for trade mark as consumers had not come to see it as an indication of origin.

Cadbury argued, in the original dispute, that consumers simply ‘associated the shape with KitKat (and therefore Nestlé), but no more than that.’

The court’s ruling was that the shape was not the thing on which consumers relied in order to confirm that the chocolate was KitKat.  The fact that the bars had KitKat stamped into the chocolate did not help Nestlé’s case, nor did the fact that there had been around since 1937 a very similar four-finger chocolate bar from Norway, called Kvikk Lunsj from Norway, which was available in parts of the UK.

The consequences of the ruling

This ruling is important as it essentially opens the way for other manufacturers, including supermarkets and other confectioners, to manufacture four-fingered KitKat copycats without fear of reprisals from Nestlé.

Nestlé said they would be considering their next steps. They pointed out that the four-finger shape had been granted trademark status in many other countries around the world, including Germany, France, Australia, South Africa, and Canada.

The case itself turned on the fact that the shape of KitKat is not distinctive enough, but this doesn’t mean that protected ‘shape marks’ have not happened before. Toblerone, for instance, has successfully trademarked it’s ‘zigzag prism shape’. Interestingly, Toblerone is owned by Mondelēz, the American firm who own Cadbury.

We hope you found this information useful – let us know by getting in touch on what you’d like to learn more about, or what you found most interesting!